To the point

.

I disagree .

Get to the point

But my . is more - defined than yours. So there!

Dotty thread, this. Easily spotted. Period.

'Luthon64

https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTKbHOgaKgeMcCwJGL0EcR2tSMkYlWWxUI_4dNz4uAU-U6UTlZD

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTSGDvbsCT4Nr9uZNA2gzI2IieeJeAykzO9wKFrY0Aj0qCOWjhH

May I point out that we have had enough pointless pun threads here…?

http://forum.skeptic.za.org/general-skepticism/to-the-point/?action=dlattach;attach=946


The question is, what is the .?

I wonder what it is with sceptics that they always raise these points

Don’t get it. I seldom get this sort of visual pun. Apparently can’t see the you-know-what. :slight_smile:

Case in point, boet! :stuck_out_tongue:

I must be a nihilist. I don’t see the .

.- discussion

.-… … -.- . - … … … ?

LIKE THIS